QMedCONNECT: Highlights of December 2019

From our Founder's Desk

Dear Readers

 Another calendar has come to an end. Time seems to fly!  It is now twelve years since QMed Knowledge Foundation was set up.

How have we fared with our objectives? This year we did 14 workshops and 28 lectures, covering around 2200 people.  Overall in the 12 years, we have conducted around 240 workshops, delivered around 430 lectures reaching out to around 24000 students & professionals. We launched three online courses between 2018 and 2019, and have got good feedback. More than 6000 people have registered for these since the launch. Do check out some of the testimonials we have received here

Looking back, it has certainly been satisfying. And looking forward, we know that there is a huge "denominator" that we need to reach out to -  Ideally all students and faculty in all medical colleges, dental colleges, nursing colleges.... and those of all institutions.

We still have "miles to go" before we sleep. 

Our dreams for 2020 are:

• Adding an online course suitable for Undergrad students

• Adding more online courses for our existing participants

• Our courses being recognized by bodies like the Councils, the ICMR and more

• Tying up with institutions for a pooled offering of workshops and online courses

• And importantly that we have the funding to sustain these activities. 

This month, I had written a blog post  (available below), where I have mentioned about the various stakeholders involved, and how we would love to interact with them. We hope a lot of interested health professionals and students will interact with us, to help us fan out across India! 

Wishing you all a wonderful 2020! 

 

Vasumathi Sriganesh

---
---

Lectures

YMT Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital

YMT Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital

Date: 04-12-2019
Total number of participants: 50

YMT Homeopathic Medical College

YMT Homeopathic Medical College

Date: 03-12-2019
Total number of participants: 40

---

From our Blog

cancer guidelines database

Cancer Guidelines Database

https://www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca/tools/cancer-guidelines-database/

This database has approximately 1000 English language Cancer guidelines. Useful for clinicians, policy makers, and researchers, it has three types of records. These are based on the "Agree Score" (details about this score are available on the website). The first is high quality guidelines that have a score higher than 60%, the second is moderate quality guidelines that have a score of less than 60%, but still meet basic inclusion criteria, and the third - is a set of guidelines from other Canadian organizations that do not provide clear recommendations linked to evidence. These do not have an Agree Score too. Details about these organizations is also available.

You can search the database with any cancer based keyword and then filter the results by type of cancer, continuum of care and its Agree score.

The organization invites submission of more guidelines, and has also provided the eligibility criteria for inclusion.

Inviting your inputs: for a more holistic approach to expand QMed's work

Inviting your inputs: for a more holistic approach to expand QMed's work

Holistic approach to education

I recently happened to attend a “peer learning network session” where the participants were people from not-for-profit organizations worldwide. I attended this virtual session, not expecting much because I knew that the context of discussion would mainly be based on primary education. But to my surprise, the points discussed turned out to be very relevant in QMed's niche area too.

How could QMed get more holistic in its approach?

I started to think on how we could use all the learning, for our specialized area - teaching literature searching and reference management in health sciences institutions.

I realized that the questions we needed answers to are:

Who are the beneficiaries? 
Who are the stakeholders? 
Who needs to do what? 
Who can help us? 
How do we get fully holistic?

Who are our beneficiaries?

We know that the beneficiaries of our offerings are - students and professionals in all health sciences streams. Students need to know how to search correctly for their academics and research. They need to know how to reference, for the same purposes. Importantly they need to do these without wasting time, and ensuring that they get the best of literature, and not miss anything important. Professionals need to know all these, not only for academics and research, but also for evidence based practice and for contributing to Indian evidence. Which means that the ultimate beneficiaries are the people who get treated by health professionals.

Who are our stake holders? Who needs to do what?

Our stakeholders include our beneficiaries, and also librarians, publishers, database vendors, journal providers and more. If we divided the beneficiaries ( students, teachers and practitioners) into contexts, professionals could also be authors, journal editors, editorial board members, policy makers, members of bodies like the MCI, conference organizers and more. While students would not be doing these jobs, they could be authors

All of them will save a lot of time if these skills are taught to them right from the undergraduate days. The ICMR STS project has an increasing number of students every year in order to increase research skills. And the skills of searching & referencing taught to them can make a big difference to them. Every health professional and student needs to understand this.

The stakeholders also includes librarians and information specialists. This group has to work at the responsibility of choosing the most cost effective resources to subscribe to and continuously offering training, mentoring and help to every researcher, clinician and student.

Policy makers have to be aware of the need to understand what constitutes the best evidence to make their policies. Board members of bodies involved in education (the various councils and boards) need to understand the importance of the skills we teach and the need of the same in the curriculum.

The educated patient community has to also understand what constitutes evidence, and what resources they need to responsibly study, if they wish to be informed and have a useful doctor-patient interaction

Journal editors, publishers and related professionals have to accept papers with the best of references, based on well done literature search. They need to understand that the research pool will gain because researchers will create better publications with such skills.

Who can help us achieve the above? 

QMed wants to get a pool of people who strongly believe that these skills must be taught across the country. Such training should be part of the curriculum. While there is no need to have it as a “formal subject with exams”, every student and faculty must learn these skills. And the teaching now must begin at the UG level. The evaluation of these skills needs to be done by some methods like:

• Search strategies should be included in the PG thesis (Faculty should be able to judge if the steps are correct and if a resident has searched all available sources)

• In posters, presentations, journal clubs, assignments etc – the search done and the references should be questioned and evaluated

More methods need to be planned for

Get involved! 

We wish to have interactions with a lot of students, faculty and practitioners of all health sciences streams, and see how we can take all this way ahead.  We need to see how we can make this more holistic. And finally we would like faculty to themselves provide a solution as to how they make themselves accountable for better learning, so that they ensure that students learn well too.

Do

write to us at info@qmed.ngo if you wish to
be part of our big picture. And of course if you have any ideas, those are
welcome too!

---

Copyright © QMed Knowledge Foundation – Trust registered with the Charity Commissioner Mumbai – Registration No: E-24663